FaidSafe logo

Applying a Risk Engineering Framework to Fatigue Safe Systems

Risk engineering frameworks focus on:

  • hazards
  • triggers
  • effects
  • safeguards
  • Residual Risks
  • Assessment of Systems Integrity

Risk engineering disciplines are based on a systematic and comprehensive identification of threats, the design of adequate safeguards and assessment of current and future risk profiles.

Organisational Fatigue Risk Grading

Risk engineers use risk grading systems to objectively rate the adequacy of current or future controls to protect against inherent exposures. The benefits of risk gradings include;

  • a consistent world wide risk assessment
  • benchmark data on risk levels
  • cost benefit comparisons
  • prioritisation of risk reduction investments

They can assist organisations to answer the question "are we fatigue safe" by identifying critical control points that can lead to unacceptable risks.

Risk Grading systems are typically based on predetermined definitions for each grading element and risk level factor, a systematic assessment of pure risks and often as many as 15 to 30 grading elements. The overall risk grading is determined using a weighted average formula based on (claims) experience over many years and industries.

Whilst an absolute answer to the key question "are organisations fatigue safe" is always going to be elusive, organisations are now able to seek assistance from risk engineers to help them identify unacceptable fatigue risk levels.

Fatigue Risk Grading System - Graid®

idZRE is a global alliance of InterDynamics (id) and Zurich Risk Engineering (ZRE). ZRE have been drawn to InterDynamics because of the 'holistic' nature of InterDynamics Faid®Safe organisational fatigue risk management service, which has gained extensive experience in the identification of fatigue related exposures and controls to a level not seen anywhere elsewhere in the world. The alliance has developed an Organisational Fatigue Risk Grading system based on predetermined definitions for each grading element and risk level factor, a systematic assessment of pure risks and incorporating 25 grading elements. The purpose of this system is to provide an objective rating of the adequacy of current and future safeguards to protect against inherent exposures.

Grading Overview

Grading

The grading tool is for risk assessment. It is made up of the various risk factors for assessing perils resulting in an overall Grading that indicates the quality of the risk.

Who uses the grading?

Gradings should be used by risk engineering professionals in assessments for global customers and local services.

Type of grading

There are or will be gradings available for all important lines of business serviced by Zurich Risk Engineering including initially Fatigue Risk, Capacity Risk and Supply Chain Interruption Risk.

Why use grading?

The benefits of risk gradings include a consistent world wide risk assessment, benchmark data on risk levels, cost benefit comparisons and prioritisation of risk reduction investments.

Purpose of grading for Risk Engineering

  • Performing the risk assessment process in a structured way
  • Supporting risk engineering professionals with given risk factors and defined risk assessment criteria
  • Increasing consistency
  • Providing results which are transparent to customers
  • Providing results that can be used for underwriting purposes

Grading Principles

Relative vs Absolute Assessments

The grading is built on the principle of the relative assessment. This means that the risk assessment criteria are different for each type of industry.

Grading Calculation

The result of the Grading is called "Overall Grading". It is calculated based on the assessment results of a set of risk factors. Risk factors are determined by a risk factor based on risk assessment criteria.

ZRE Graid® Scores

The Zurich Risk Engineering linkage is emphasised by promoting a "ZRE Graid® score" to indicate the quality of the risk.

e.g. 1. "a ZRE Fatigue Graid® score of 130"

- means a "FAIR" Organisational Fatigue Risk Grade which has been
assessed by a certified Zurich Risk Engineering Professional.

e.g. 2. "a Fatigue Graid® score of 80"

- means a "GOOD" Organisational Fatigue Risk Grade which has been assessed by an individual or organisation who is not a certified Zurich Risk Engineering Professional.


Subscribe to 'Focus on Fatigue'

Latest news:

- FAID v2.0 released

- Fatigue-Risk Management Forum papers

- Luxembourg FRMS Aviation Conference papers


More detail...

 

Articles:

FAQs

Risk management overview

Why fatigue management?

Full list...



© 2003–2010 InterDynamics Pty Ltd, Australia. ACN 057 037 635.